Clive McBarton put forth on 3/8/2010 3:29 PM: > That benchmark/article is from 2006 though, and the references are from > 2003 and 2006. The hard disks are PATA and slow (100 and 133). Are there > any newer benchmarks?
I'm constantly Googling trying to find new ones. Apparently (and unfortunately), thoughtful, thorough, and fair comparative Linux filesytem benchmarking is a very rare hobby. :( The 2006 numbers should be pretty close to today's code performance. I've not heard of any major revisions to the core code of any of these filesystems since 2006 that gives any kind of serious performance boost. Even though the hardware is old as dirt, the testing is apples to apples, do direct comparison is possible. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b956ea9.1090...@hardwarefreak.com
