On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:28:23 +0000, Kelly Harding wrote: >>> Neither of which are enterprise/stable releases in the same vein at >>> RHEL, Debian stable etc, hence not ncluded. >> >> Uh? I cannot speak for Fedora but sure openSUSE is rock-solid and has >> stable release cycle. I was using it in my servers and workstations for >> the last 6 years. >> >> Besides, the OP did mention nothing about "enterprise" or "long term", >> just "distros/operating systems" so the table is very good but leaves >> many other distros (Archlinux, openSUSE, Fedora, Gentoo, >> openSolaris...) :-) > > I was meaning in relation to that chart, which does state 'enterprise'. > SuSE have their own > offering for that, hence openSUSE isn't really valid there I guess.
We should first define what an "enterprise" OS is. Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows Vista (listed in the chart) are more far away for an "enterprise" OS than openSUSE, I think, or at least at the same /level/, to say something >:-) Solaris/openSolaris is also missing. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.02.27.18.48...@gmail.com
