On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:08:43 +0800, Jason Heeris wrote: > On 16 February 2010 16:51, Camaleón wrote: >> Package "udftools" comes with "wrudf" which is decribes as: >> >> *** >> wrudf - Maintains a UDF filesystem (undocumented) *** > > Ah yes... wow, it is quite undocumented, isn't it...
Yes :-( >> Not sure why you need a UDF filesystem :-?. > > I wanted: > 1. A filesystem that works easily on the other major OSs - narrows it > down to FAT, NTFS, or UDF Even NTFS should be better in this sitution :-} > 2. A filesystem that doesn't screw up permissions (eg. all my files set > to a+rwx when I copy them back off FAT) - narrows it down to UDF :/ ¿NTFS? It should fit some of your requirements (works on windows, linux and MacOS -I think-) and allows ACL. > But if it's flaky and the tools are unmaintained, I guess there is no FS > that satisfies them both and I should use ext2 or FAT (since HFS has no > free drivers for XP). A networked hard disk (stand-alone enclosure or attached to a computer via samba/nfs/sshfs) is desiderable when several OS need access on it. This way, filesystem does not matter at all :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2010.02.16.11.30...@gmail.com
