[snip]
I fail to see what it's doing, but I cannot see any reference to "eth1",
it's like only one interace is being recognized :-?
What is the output of "dmesg | grep eth"?
[ 6.317161] eth1: RTL8168d/8111d at 0xffffc90000c4e000, xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx,
XID 083000c0 IRQ 32
[ 6.384830] eth1: unable to apply firmware patch
[ 7.190453] udev: renamed network interface eth1 to eth0
[ 7.229390] udev: renamed network interface eth0_rename to eth1
[ 11.276999] r8169: eth0: link up
[ 11.277005] r8169: eth0: link up
[ 12.215716] eth1: setting full-duplex.
[ 21.531029] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[ 22.599867] eth1: no IPv6 routers present
Again, eth1 is working fine; eth0 seems completely blocked/nonfunctional,
despite all the configuration files and netstats looking fine.
I made a minor effort earlier to suppress the IPv6 modules, but [a] didn't
succeed; and [b] hadn't suppressed them earlier with the one-interface
system so wasn't convinced it was worth trying - why shouldn't this cause
eth1 to quit as well as eth0? Also the previous system showed some
indications of IPv6 in its reports, and it worked fine.
Thanks,
-Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
