On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:11, Eicke wrote: > Sorry! > I was wrong. My processor is Xeon 32 bits.
All Xeons are 32 bits. The only 64 bit Intel CPUs are Itanium(-2). > Regards. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Arnt Karlsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:01 PM > Subject: Re: Memory > > > > On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:54:58 -0600, > > "Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Eicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hi Gary I appreciate your response. > > > > My machine is a Dual Xeon 2.8 GHz 64-bit. > > > > Should be happens the errors anyway? > > > > > > Clear up some things for us Eicke. First, I may be behind on my Intel > > > marketing, but aren't the Xeon line of processors just good ole > > > Pentium 4's (32-bit) with extra cache? Is Intel marketing the Itanium > > > (64-bit) under the Xeon name? > > > > > > Second, did these applications ever work under Linux on your system? > > > > > > If indeed Intel is selling 64-bit Xeons(TM) using Itanium processors > > > then I'll have to pass on answering your questions as I have no > > > experience with Linux on the Itanium processor. My no-experience guess > > > would be that you'd need to compile the kernel with Itanium support, > > > which I don't see as an option in my 2.4.21 kernel configuration, and > > > install 64-bit Itanium versions of the applications you're trying to > > > use. > > > > ..I thought Intel dropped their 64bit Itanic??? (I only know it > > from the row raised by the Serious Con Operation lawsuit on IBM.) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA The difference between drunken sailors and Congressmen is that drunken sailors spend their own money. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
