On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:44:54 -0500, Celejar wrote: > > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > ... > > > >> One is Flash Player, needed as much as hated, but it's a matter of fact > >> that for todays browsing is a "must have". > > > > Disagree. I do most of my browsing in an IW profile without Flash. It's > > easy enough to download YouTube video using youtube-dl or clive / > > cclive, and the only sites that seem to really require Flash are flashy > > game or advertisement sites, which I can generally do without. I don't > > deny that Flash can be useful, but I wouldn't call it a "must have". > > Some animations, multimedia applications or control buttons for > validating user input data that are embedded in a flash container need to > call external (x)html code (remote javascript, XML files or action > script) to be properly managed and displayed so you can interact with > them. > > Not all the flashes out there are just "movies" :-) Understood, but my point stands: I do most of my browsing without Flash enabled, and don't seem to suffer much for it. Celejar -- foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
