Neal Lippman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Aside from the present market penetration of X (which could also be > used to argue to stick with Windows instead of ever having adopted > Linux), what would be the obstacle (other than, of course, the > time/effort for development) for a new graphics paradigm to sit atop > Linux? [Yes, I know there'd be a lot of apps to redo and so forth as > well, although if there were a Gtk+ compatibility layer...)
I see three ways in which you've answered your own question. Obstacles include (i) existing "market" penetration of X, (ii) time and effort required to develop a replacement, and (iii) a large installed base of existing X-compatible applications. -- Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
