Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Dave Witbrodt wrote:
David Baron wrote:
Getting a lot of warnings about this on recent udev upgrades. I tried
substituting in some of the rules files but might have caused
problems. Fact is that this was tested with the recent broken udev
and problems were (also?) from udev itself.
Should ATTR be simply substituted for SYSFS?
Should bugs be filed against the offending rules parents or will
these changes simply be systematically done in course?
If you are using Sid -- and I think you are, because I had the recent
udev breakage and I get the udev error messages you are talking about
-- then don't do anything. Nothing is really wrong.
The error message is a warning: it only affects the 'hplip' package,
and a bug report has already been filed
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559289
Once the hplip gets around to upgrading the files they drop into
/etc/udev/rules, all will be well again. In the meantime, the warning
is scarier than it looks.
But there are a lot of messages that take a long time.
He complains about:
/etc/udev/rules.d/024_hpmud.rules
/etc/udev/rules.d/025_logitechmouse.rules
/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_libsane-extras.rules
/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_libsane.rules
/etc/udev/rules.d/024_hpmud.rules
Most went away by upgrading libsane + removing kcontrol
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
