On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:48, Carlos Sousa wrote: <snip> > I'm tracking testing, but there are quite a few packages I usually get > from unstable (openoffice.org, sylpheed, mozilla, etc), that are > currently piling up on my wait queue because of their recent dependency > on libc6 >= 2.3.2, which I've learnt to treat with the utmost respect... > > Do you think I could upgrade to the new libc6 without major system > breakage?
I would say right NOW unstable is in better shape right now than Testing by a LONG shot. Right this second libc6 is good (a couple of non-i386 buggers). I don;t have any probs with it... -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry Your teeth are as soft as liquid stones poured from an aquamarine vase of solidifying flesh.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
