On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:18, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Or the poster doesn't know much about Java. Having used Java, I'd > > say that Java isn't good for small programs/quick hacks. > > And what I've seen of the larger stuff in Java, it's horrably slow and > unreliable. So if it's too elephantine for little stuff and two slow > and warped for the big stuff, just what the heck is Java good for again?
Seems to be a solution looking for a problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
