I wrote: > It didn't say that the secret had been received, only that debian-devel > had been whitelisted. Nost likely, the user did so manually.
manoj writes: > And elected to recieve a message obviously spam and infected with a > virus? How would he have known that? He had not seen the message yet if I understand correctly. In any case, it seems more likely that he whitelisted the address manually than that the virus successfully returned the secret. > And now would get any and all viruses from anyone who yet again spoofs > the mailing list as the sender? No doubt. > yes, I can see how this is so much better than my filtering system that > has caught all these messages from day one. I can't, but then I'm not advocating C-R. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
