On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 18:12, Paul M Foster wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:11:08AM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote: [snip] > in C++. I spent far more time in design, and far more time debugging > than I ever had in C. So I went back to C. Now my C code looks like
<SARCASM> Aghhhhhh!!! He spent lot's of time designing software!!!!!!! Run, hide!!!! The world is coming to an end!!!!!!!!!!!! </SARCASM> Seriously, though, OO languages, being born of academia, were designed *not* to be quick-'n-dirty languages. They were designed with large projects in mind (the whole Software Design Life Cycle bit). If you want a (IMHO) good mix between QnD and OO, try Python. It is totally comfortable with procedural coding and OO coding. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jefferson, LA USA "Our computers and their computers are the same color. The conversion should be no problem!" Unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
