In <4a2544d6.4090...@l33tmyst.com>, Harry Rickards wrote: >On 06/02/09 15:53, Nuno Magalhães wrote: >>> [html makes your posts ugly and difficult to read.] >> >> I'd say that's a matter of opinion... However i agree that mail should >> be in simple text, especially if the list rules say so. > >While I use Thunderbird, some people use CLI-based mail clients such as >alpine or mutt. In these, HTML shows up as the actual HTML code.
I use KMail, and have it configured to not render HTML by default, but instead show either the text/plain alternative or the unrendered HTML. Most of the time I ignore any message to a mailing list that shows unrendered HTML. So, even in GUI-based mail clients HTML shows up as the actual HTML code., but only if they are properly configured (or terribly misconfigured [1]). -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/ [1] It's a matter of opinion, but I'm guessing that's what Andrei would call my KMail.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
