In <1243108942.3476.2.ca...@debian-lap>, Hashimoto wrote: >Just a doubt regarding my system processing division. While monitoring >the CPU processing I realized the CPU1 is always more busy then CPU0. > >Is it any issue to worry about ?
Not normally. >If not, why this difference ? Processor auto-affinity, plus programs with different amounts of CPU usage between voluntary relinquishing the CPU. >Any >idea ? > >Follow 3 basics processes running now. > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ >COMMAND > 5140 hashimot 20 0 693m 649m 95m S 100 27.0 28:03.32 >VirtualBox > 2996 root 20 0 151m 74m 13m S 17 3.1 28:10.13 >Xorg > 4306 hashimot 20 0 327m 133m 19m S 13 5.5 60:05.93 >firefox-bin Just considering those 3 processes, that CPU usage pattern seems natural and probably gives better performance that migrating the processes between CPUs in an attempt to level usage. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
