On 2009/04/23 23:52 (GMT+0100) thveillon.debian composed: > Felix Miata a écrit :
>> I really don't understand Debian including X all the way down in runlevel 2 >> either. What's the point of having a bunch of runlevels and running only on >> either of only 2? > I don't find it less rational to use runlevels 1 and 2 > rather than 3 and 5 like in OpenSuse... And there's a "single" or > "recovery" entry in the grub menu too. My question was quite serious, and not just about a simple way to not start X on boot. 2 in Debian is everything. 2 in non-debian distros is multiuser instead of single. 3 adds full networking. 5 adds X. Why is it "good" that most debians lump all those functions together? -- "He who works his land will have abundant food, but the one who chases fantasies will have his fill of poverty." Proverbs 28:19 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org