On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:15:56PM +0000, Adam Hardy wrote: > Douglas A. Tutty on 04/03/09 14:46, wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:09:33PM +0000, Nuno Magalh??es wrote: > >>On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Thorny <thorntreeh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>Where did you find this? Can you provide a link so I can look at it? > >>I stand corrected, minimal 48MB, recommended 512MB.[1] You're using > >>256, i had a system with 196 but this one only has 128... we'll see. > >>Thanks for the heads-up. > >> > >>[1] http://debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch03s04.html.en > > > >I have a PII-233 with 64 MB ram. (I have lesser boxes but they run > >OpenBSD now). > > > >I also have a PII-450 but it has 1GB ram. > > You're going to have to give these up at some point before 2038 you know.
Why, because Linux can't implement a 64-bit time format on a 32-bit processor? If they can do it for filesystems, why not time? I don't know what the format for the hwclock is so don't know when it rolls over, but there ought to be a work-around before 2038. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
