On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 08:40:51 +0000, Tim Day (tim...@bottlenose.demon.co.uk) wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 08:57 +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: > > Alternatively, you can try the UUID=<filesystem-uuid> for mounting the > > drive. > > Is there any reason to think the UUID version will work any better than > labels ? If I have the labels method working fine with 2.6.18, why > would they not work with 2.6.26 ? > > > Another option is to specify the names as sda, sdb, etc. > > Currently (2.6.18) I have a hda (the IDE drive) and an sda and sdb for > the 2 SATA drives. Is there any way to predict where the hda drive will > move to under 2.6.26 ? (ie should it appear as sda and the two existing > sd* drives will move up to sdb & sdc, or will hda move to sdc ?) Your IDE drive should still be hda (or at least hdn rather than sdn) with 2.6.26. At least, that is what I see here with IDE drives in two separate lenny boxen, one of which was an upgrade from etch and one a clean lenny install several months ago. -- Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK. Please reply to the list only. Do NOT send copies directly to me. Debian on the NSLU2: http://bobcox.com/slug/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
