Aneurin Price wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> wrote: > >> Or ditch Gmail for something sane > > I'm puzzled as to why you consider Gmail's behaviour to be erroneous. > Using 'reply' (as opposed to 'followup'/'reply to all') should correctly > address > a mail to the reply-to address (which was not set in the mail which prompted > this discussion), or faling that, to the original sender. Anything else would > be > simply wrong. If it's true that Gmail does not honour reply-to, then that > would > be a problem, but irrelevant given that it wasn't set in the first place. > >
I believe the (quite valid) suggestion to ditch Gmail is because it does not have a 'reply to list function'. Well, there are several other reasons, but this is the one relevant to this discussion. -- Lots of folks are forced to skimp to support a government that won't. Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br http://move.to/hpkb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
