* Bijan Soleymani ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 08:43:21AM +0100, Mark wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:33:03PM -0400, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > > > > > > This makes a lot of sense. I mean if the FSF hired you to write a > > > GPL program, they wouldn't want you to release a proprietary version of > > > it after you quit working for them. > > > > > > > Why would they care? They would have their GPLed version, if you > > choose to write a closed version, that's your choice. > > If they didn't care about closed version they wouldn't use the GPL.
This is broken logic. The FSF would have nothing to lose from a closed version of a GPL piece of software being developed. If GPL'd(GPLed? which is less stoopid?) _code_ was used, that'd be a different issue though. iain -- wh33, y1p33 3tc. "If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not rightly owned if it is not shared." -St. Augustine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
