On Sunday 2008 December 21 15:00:44 Alex Samad wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 03:44:04AM -0600, M.Lewis wrote: > > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > >> On Sunday 21 December 2008, "M.Lewis" <ca...@cajuninc.com> wrote about > >> 'Re: e2fsck /dev/md0 issues': > >>> Maybe what I should do is break the array and start over? > >>> Maybe that is a more drastic action than is needed though. > >> > >> Yep. You just need to resize your filesystem to the correct size, as > >> reported by the /dev/md0 device and suggested by my earlier email. > > > > So all I need to do is 'resize2fs /dev/md0 244189984'. Then e2fsck > > should run with no errors. > > I would suggest maybe a resize2fs /dev/md0 and see what that does first? > The other question to ask is how it ended up like this.
Probably by imaging and deploying the fs with dd. Either that or some ill-informed forcing of the filesystem to the larger size. I really don't think there's anything wrong with the drives or the md device. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
