On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 07:14:37PM -0600, lee wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:30:02PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > On Wednesday 2008 December 10 16:52:03 lee wrote: > > If you can find enough people with the same problems and co-ordinate, you > > might be able to reduce the amount of effort each of you put forward. If > > time is what it takes to reproduce, that's fine -- just figure out what a > > good upper bound is. Is 1 day long enough without drops long enough to say > > the kernel is good? 7 days? 30 days? > > I'd say 1/2 year in this case.
In Stable (Etch), new kernels come out far more frequently than that. Since you have to reboot to get the new kernel, even without a power-cycle, anyone who keeps their system up-to-date likely won't be able to provide anecdotal evidence of their system _not_ loosing a drive, since the uptime is never that long. Why haven't you been keeping the kernel up-to-date? Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
