It seems that the difference in package really did matter.
apt-cache policy libssl0.9.8
libssl0.9.8:
Installed: 0.9.8c-4
Candidate: 0.9.8c-4etch3
Version table:
0.9.8c-4etch3 0
500 http://debian.savoirfairelinux.net stable/main Packages
500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages
*** 0.9.8c-4 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Does anyone knows how to explain this. I'm pretty new to debian and
particulary linux. Thanks!
Chris Davies wrote:
Bob Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is how I do it when setting up a new machine:
ssh-keygen -t dsa
<enter, enter, enter>
cat ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat >> .ssh/authorized_keys2'
<enter password>
Mmm. Interesting as I find authorized_keys works for me (none of my
Debian systems claims to understand your ssh2 variant).
ssh-keygen -t rsa # Does anyone know whether dsa or rsa is better?
...
ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'mkdir -pm 700 .ssh;cat>>.ssh/authorized_keys'
<.ssh/id_rsa.pub
Actually I have a little script that does this for me (ssh-auth) that I
really ought to get round to offering to the ssh client distribution.
It's at http://www.roaima.co.uk/stuff/20080819/ssh-auth if anyone's
interested in critiquing it first.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
