On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:09:02 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:22:48PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:09:14 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:23:48PM -0400, Mark Phillips wrote: > > > > I think I solved the problem. The files were missing, but also found.
[ snip: python upgrade problem solved by clever symlink trickery ] > > I suspect that the problem may have been caused by using python 2.3 to > > perform the setup of python 2.5. Even Etch has python 2.4 as the default > > version already. Mark, do you know why your system defaulted to python > > 2.3? Has it been a really long time (years) since the previous upgrade? > > he's been, so far as I can tell, using apt-get upgrade. Mightn't that > cause him to stay on 2.3? Good point, I think that explains it. Aptitude now calls the two commands "safe-upgrade" and "full-upgrade", respectively; let's hope that this will help to avoid this classical misunderstanding about "upgrade" and "dist-upgrade". -- Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
