[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:19:12 -0300 > > With mencode I used the following command (using PAL in my country): > > mencoder tv:// -tv > driver=v4l2:input=1:norm=pal:width=640:height=480:device=/dev/video0: > freq=775.25:adevice=/dev/dsp1:forceaudio:audiorate=32000 buffersize=64 > -ovc lavc -lavcopts vcodec=mpeg4:vbitrate=400:keyint=30 -oac mp3lame > -lameopts br=32:cbr:mode=3 -ffourcc divx -o "test.avi" > > I tried to change the options, but no matter what I did, the result was > poor. > > With transcode I used this command: > > transcode -x v4l2=resync_margin=1:resync_interval=250,v4l2 -g 640x480 > -i /dev/video0 -p /dev/dsp -e 32000,16,2 -N 0x1 -J > resample,levels,smartyuv,pv -w 4000 -y ffmpeg -F mpeg4 -o test.avi > > Which results in some larger files, but with excelent quality. > > Any advice on how to improve would be greatly appreciated, especially > about the file sizes that transcode produces.
I have not used transcode in a long time, but it seems to me at first glance that the above command has a video bitrate of 4000 whereas the mencoder is 400. If the mencoder command is as you have typed it here such a low bitrate could be at least part of the trouble. Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
