With the RAID array I am planning to use RAID 5 so my data is still
protected. My confusion is going with RAID striping (picking the right
size). Also, Does the filesystem layout need to be specific when I do
striping? If I am using 128k stripes, should I start my filesystem on 129k
and end with max-(128+1k)?


On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 11:15 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 06/07/08 07:27, Mag Gam wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a RAID controller with 256MB of on board cache and its connected
> > > to 12 500GB SATA disks. I am planning to create 2 RAID groups (6 disks
> > > each), but I don't know what is the optimal stripe size should be.
> >
> > That's very controler-specific.  Read the manual.
> >
> > > Also, once I stripe on the RAID controller I am planning to use LVM. Is
> > > striping a good idea? What should I consider for the filesystem?
> >
> > Striping is a GREAT idea IFF you want serious speed, but don't care
> > about your data.  If one of the disks goes flaky, *all* the data on
> > the stripeset goes poof.
> >
> > So, *never* use striping on a production server!!  Unless you hate
> > the company, are vindictive, and are about to leave.
> >
> > Otherwise, use RAID 0, 10, 0+1 or 5.
> >
> > If you make huge RAID sets, I don't see the purpose of LVM.  OTOH,
>
> for one, if you make a bad partition choice.  With LVM, you can shrink
> one and grow the other as needed.
>
> > if you make 6 mirror sets, use LVM to make a 6 "device" unit.
> >
> > Also, Damon is correct about booting.  In fact, I'd have a separate
> > boot device.
> >
> > Lastly, to what media are you going to back all this data up?  How
> > frequently?
> >
> > - --
> > Ron Johnson, Jr.
> > Jefferson LA  USA
>
> To back up Ron's input:
>
> http://www.linuxjunkies.org/html/LVM-HOWTO.html#s8  it is a bit dated,
> but the info is good.
>
>
> --
> Damon L. Chesser
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
>

Reply via email to