On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:00:26PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 05/27/08 15:27, Public Mailing Lists wrote:
> > > Would using mbox make it any better? > > Depends on your definition of "better". uw-imapd and (maybe) > Dovecot support mbox-backed-IMAP, so maybe that's the route you > should take. uw-imapd supports mbox and an improved folder-in-a-file format called mbx. Dovecot supports both. It also indexes the mbox file (assuming that it is the only one modifiying it, according to ctime). -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849754 | | friend -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
