On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 04:57:39PM +1000, Rich Healey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Owen Townend wrote: > > On 25/05/2008, Sjoerd Hiemstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 May 2008 03:11:05 +1000 Owen Townen wrote: > >> > On 24/05/2008, Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>> http://www.lessaid.net/fun/apt-get-wife.png > >> > > >> > >>> heh, I still like `apt-get moo` > >> > >> The inventor of 'aptitude moo' has sense of humour as well > >> > >> > > > > Yeah, he/they even went that extra step of `aptitude --help|grep Cow` > > to match apt-get. Tru dedication to the humour. > > > > cheers, > > Owen. > > > > > I still believe that you need to find a Woman that matches you, so > apt-get -b source wife seems more likely, and besides, the apt-get > build-dep wife should prepare you for marraige ;)
apt-get -b source wife is nice because you're not getting the binary... whatever that means, but instead the source code required which can be easily modified. THen you can build, test, modify to your heart's desire. Though what you do with the builds that you don't want is a problem. I'm sure glad my mk1mod0 wife doesn't read this list... Though I'd not trade her for any flashy features that may come in newer versions... A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
