On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 07:17:12PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:47:48 +0100 > Bob Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 15:09:22 -0400, Frank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > > > > > I am running Sid using IceWm, not Gnome. Today for the first time ever > > > I tried suspending the computer from the GDM menu...but nothing > > > happened. I have auto login enabled so a few seconds later I was > > > logged back in. Is there some config files that have to be > > > changed/adjusted for suspend to work. I am running the stock 686 > > > kernel, and very average hardware on an Intel MB. > > > > Sorry I can't help with your suspend problem. > > > > I've been subscribed to this list for a few weeks and in that time > > I have never seen a PGP signature fail like yours did: > > > > gpg: requesting key D2C6E9F2 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. > > gpg: Total number processed: 0 > > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > > > > Is this a problem with my accessing the hkp server or with the original > > signature?
Bob, Frank's sig fails for me too... > > > Or like yours? > > > [application/pgp-signature (No public key to verify the signature)] > Signature made at Sun 06 Apr 2008 04:47:48 PM EDT > No public key to verify the signature > Key fingerprint: B51408D89FF9A76D > Cannot find user ID for this key. Frank, Bob's works fine for me but who knows how long it's been in my local keys files. > > This whole PGP thing drives me nuts sometimes. Is there ONE server > everybody is supposed to use...I thought the servers exchanged keys ?? > A third of the signed messages fail the check. I've seen a lot more of them fail lately, it seems, than in the past. I use MIT's keyservers and they seem pretty good, but who really knows? not me. I do notice that it seems to be taking longer and longer to get keys off the net. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
