On Mon, March 3, 2008 21:00, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:03:32PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: >> Wouldn't a chrooted ftp server do the same thing? > > ftp is a intrinsecally more complex protocol than http (see the problems > for firewalls with active/passive ftp... > > Moreover, the security history of ftp daemons is worse than the security > history of http daemons (and it is possibly even worse than the security > history of portmap/nfsd) >
Neither ftp not minimalistic http would work in this case. Ftp is to unsafe and minimal http wouldn't be sufficient for the streaming scripts / mods. I think rsync would be the only viable option. I'll go shopping for some diskspace... Thanks for all the replies. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]