On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 06:19:01PM -0500, H.S. wrote: > Chris Bannister wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 07:02:23PM -0500, H.S. wrote: > >So you installed some ttfs, and if you print a .pdf all is ok, but if > >you print a .ps it isn't? > > Yes, that is pretty much it. > I use the following fonts. > $> apt-cache policy ttf-indic-fonts > ttf-indic-fonts: > Installed: 1:0.5.1 > Candidate: 1:0.5.1 > Version table: > *** 1:0.5.1 0 > 500 ftp://gulus.usherbrooke.ca testing/main Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > > >How do you generate your .pdf compared with your .ps, or is it a menu > >choice, which unfortunately hides all the gory details. > > From within OOo from a menu, it exports the odt file directly to PDF. >
What happens if you generate your .pdf (which seems to include the fonts) then use a converter (there are several) to generate a ps from that? Are there any that don't use gs, that would use the fonts in the pdf file? This may sound stupid (but it may work): there's a pdf to html converter that turns each pdf page into a graphic that then a browser can display. Would this round-about method work if the image could then be turned into a ps? Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
