On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:13:13 +0000 Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:38:18AM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: > > hhding wrote: > > >why debian? > > >why centos? > > > > > >It seems same to me, and current we run debian as server. > > >But managers want run centos instead. > > > > > > > If you are using some proprietary software that is supported on > > RHEL (or Centos) and not on Debian, and you depend on that support. > > > > Can't think of any other reasons. We run a couple of proprietary > > applications at work that are only supported on RHEL. I have had no > > problem running them on Debian Etch. YMMV. > > Right. But then again, that software is probably not certified to work > on CentOS. It's certified to run on RHEL. CentOS is not RHEL, even > though it is based on its code and it is pretty close. > AIUI, wasn't the codebase just run through sed and all instances of RHEL switched to CENTOS? :oP </flamebait> M. -- |Matthew Macdonald-Wallace |Tiger Computing Ltd |"The Linux Specialists" | |Tel: 0845 373 3579 |Web: http://www.tiger-computing.co.uk | |Registered in England. Company number: 3389961 |Registered address: Wyastone Business Park, | Wyastone Leys, Monmouth, NP25 3SR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
