-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:18:18PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote: > 1) Neither I nor anyone I know cares if you are who you say you are or not. > ( In fact, someone could forge your PGP sig because most people don't > have the software, and do you MORE harm that way. How would you prove > which of two nearly simultaneous posts with the EXACT same PGP sig on them > was the real one. )
That would require your private key. Most people don't go leaving their private keys laying around for everybody to use. > 2) They are a an extreme violation of netiquette No, they're not. > 3) They are a waste of bandwidth on several levels Not particularly, no more than your rant. > 4) They make posts hard to read and ugly. Well, that's why PGP/MIME exists. Problem is, Outlook barfs on those for no good reason, and thus is holding back progress once again. - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/L0kRJ5vLSqVpK2kRApoAAKDWCIW8/mzXZN3ueS9gnWOoFN93ogCdE3Hb dPpJOPiZEllAN4odipVYBPE= =3zfT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
