On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:57:04 +1100 Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [flame on] > but we do read chronologically (in date order) and I for one hate > having to go 3 pages down to read the answer to the previous email > (in a threaded news reader!). That's why you properly clip the message you're responding to into the relevant parts, and then you reply separately to those points. > Although I do admit that if you start in the last email of a thread > it easier to read top to bottom The idea is that every posting, even though it is far into some thread, is to a certain extent self-contained. > [flame off] No reason to flame anybody. ...and down here followed lots of irrelevant, older stuff, all of which I've clipped. --D. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
