On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:13:37AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:14:27 +0200, David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Then send your answer to the list. > > Had it been appropriate to send it to the list, I would have > done so. I am not going to do things I consider inappropriate in > order to work around silly challenge response system from my > correspondent.
Point taken. > > Getting tens of mails of spam a day and hitting `d' on them requires > > a lot more brain cycles then (almost) blindly responding to a > > challenge. But that is just my guess, or my opinion. > > And mine differs. Ok. > > I'm sorry you have objections to C-R systems. But hey, it's your > > right to have them. Furthermore, I'm sorry to have bothered you to > > the point you found it necessary to reply to me. > > I am not bothered. I merely wanted you to be aware that your > system has false positives; but it is your decision. I'm using SA. It's just that I don't mind C-R and like the general concept, but I see many people who's opinions I value and who's mails I'd rather not send to /dev/null would not respond to a challenge, either out of principle, annoyance or feasibility. Oh well, I'll stick to filtering... (anyone knows of a trick to automatically whitelist all correspondents on debian-user? ;-) David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
