On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:50:37AM +0100, Dal wrote: > Daniel Burrows wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:14:18AM -0600, Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> was heard to say: >> >>> On Oct 28, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Burrows wrote: >>> >>>> I'd say the main difference is that apt-get is a command-line tool, >>>> whereas aptitude is an interactive tool that can be driven from the >>>> command-line. >>>> >>> I would disagree. Aptitude supports command-line operation as well as >>> interactive. >>> >> >> What I meant by that is that the project's goals and focus ...
> Aptitude user interface is really great. When I started with debian there > was just dselect and I don't think that was user friendly. > Just aptitude and synaptic too make debian easier for normal users. Anyway > it's pity that aptitude doesn't (maybe I just can't find it) source > download. Something like apt-get source package. > > Anyway it has really better problems-with-packages solving :) > yeah, Daniel, great work! just want to ask the same question as above as regards build-dep? Will that become a part of aptitude in the future or will it remain in apt-get with the two packages maintained in parallel? thanks for your work on debian! A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
