El dom, 23-09-2007 a las 14:41 -0500, Manoj Srivastava escribió: > On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:14:57 -0400, Douglas A Tutty > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On small systems, what about the penalty of just larger binaries? I > > have some older boxes with 16-64 MB ram. > > Firstly: Very few packages have been actively patched to link > with selinux. Second, the selinux libraries are shared libs -- so the > actual binary is not significantly increased in size (well, dpkg is the > exception, since it is linked statically with selinux). > > My Pentium II box with 64MB of ram seems to run in SELinux > strict mode just fine -- it is my firewall. > > manoj > --
The real problem with SELinux is that it come from a really well known untrusted organization around the globe; and if the Debian Team accep it blindly, Debian is going to become as Windows; remember that, who creates, know it the best; and a group of pepople could see into our own machine when they want it. Particularly, i do not want that! It is exactly, giving the realized work, for decades, to the enemy! > Lord, what fools these mortals be! William Shakespeare, "A > Midsummer-Night's Dream" > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> > 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
