Hello,

Actually I have some troubels concerning samba (3.0.24) on debian (4.0):

I would like to have some samba-shares on a nfs-filesystem.

NFS works fine for the Linux clients and the Linux server. The nfs 
filesystem is mounted from an other server on /home.

The next step is to set up samba to have some shares on the nfs Filesystem 
(/home/$LOGIN, anonymized configuration attached).
Connecting to the samba shares works for Linux and Windows clients fine. 
Downloading files also does fine.
Copying files from the local filesystem to the samba-shares works fine for 
Linux-clients (via smb!), but not for Windows clients:
Copying files from Windows 2k to the samba share results in the following 
error message:

foo kann nicht kopiert werden: Der Prozess kann nicht auf die Datei 
zugreifen, da ein anderer Prozess einen Teil der Datei gesperrt hat.
(In english something like:
Can't copy foo: process cannot acces the file as some other file is 
locking a part of the file.)

But there is no other process accessing this file.

Applications can "save" their files to the samba shares. These files have 
the filesized as wished by the windows-application but are filled with 
zeros.

According to http://www.debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83647 I am 
not alone with this problem. Further:
The member of that forum wrote that he had compiled several samba verisons 
by himself on debian 4.0/etch:
The problem did not occur with samba 3.0.22 and 3.0.23. But the problem 
occured also on the "self-compiled" samba 3.0.24.

He also compiled several versions of samba on debian 3.1/sarge:
There the problem did not occour with any version of samba.

I have tried to have these samba-shares on nfs3 and nfs4 filesystems. The 
choice of nfs3 or nfs4 doesn't affect the problem.

So my question is how it is possible to use samba on debian 4.0 in such a 
configuration.
I would prefer to use official debian packages or the packges from the 
samba.org-webpage (but at the moment there are no Debianpackages for 
Debian 4.0 on the samba Webpage).
I could compile samba by myself, but I would prefer some other solution.

Thanks and best regards
Thomas
------------
PS: As I don't know wheter it is a samba issue or only a debian issue, 
I "crosspost" to both mailinglists. 
-- 
Thomas Flaig
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[global]
        workgroup = $WORKGROUPNAME
        server string = %h server
        interfaces = $IPs
        bind interfaces only = Yes
        obey pam restrictions = Yes
        passdb backend = tdbsam
        pam password change = Yes
        passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
        passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n 
*Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* .
        log level = 2
        syslog = 0
        log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
        max log size = 1000
        printcap name = cups
        logon path = \\$HOSTNAME\%U\profile
        logon drive = H:
        logon home = \\$HOSTNAME\%U
        domain logons = Yes
        os level = 240
        preferred master = Yes
        domain master = Yes
        dns proxy = No
        wins support = Yes
        panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
        invalid users = root
        printing = cups
        print command = 
        lpq command = %p
        lprm command = 

[homes]
        comment = Home Directories
        path = /home/%S/
        valid users = %S
        read only = No
        create mask = 0751
        directory mask = 0751
        browseable = No

[printers]
        comment = All Printers
        path = /var/spool/samba
        create mask = 0700
        printable = Yes
        browseable = No

[print$]
        comment = Printer Drivers
        path = /var/lib/samba/printers
        write list = root, @lpadmin

Reply via email to