Also sprach Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.18.1537 +0200]: > 3) RAID 5 is not resilient against multiple failures. We now use RAID 1. > RAID 1 is also faster, although it sometimes requires more drives. > In extreme cases we use RAID 1 with three or more drives.
On Monday 20 August 2007 00:36, martin f krafft wrote: > RAID 1 is also not resilient to multiple failures. Is the loss of N-1 members of an N-way RAID-1 not survivable? --Mike Bird
