On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:31AM +0700, Kieu Minh Thang wrote:
> testing again, wvdial can make phone call too but quality is not good. the 
> sound too noise.
> just modify config file. provide phone, username, password (don't care about 
> username/password
> here)
> 
> Thang Kieu

I'm not really sure what you're trying to do, but I guess you want to have
the computer dial and then use the voice phone, maybe over the computer
speaker.  I sometimes use this for checking voice mailbox messages,
but you can also use a regular telephone handset after the computer dials.

You'll probably need to search/google for the appropriate AT commands for
your modem and/or telephone host system if you want to do anything fancy.
I sometimes need to dial in spite of a "pulsing" dial-tone due to pending
messages, suspend call-waiting interruptions, etc., and there are code
sequences to do those kinds of things.

The main "trick" in using the computer as a dialer is to end the AT command
sequence with a semicolon (I think) in order to return the modem to "command
mode".  Otherwise, the default behavior of the modem is to progress to 
negotiating with a modem on the other end, with all the funny-sounding tones
and beeps.

In general, I find it's best to first figure out how to do something manually,
as you're doing with wvdial or minicom, before trying to automate it.

Ken

> 
> On 8/17/07, Kieu Minh Thang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>     Hi all,
>     That's great, I have tried with minicom and looking around for some AT 
> commands.
>     Have been successful to dial with minicom.
>     connect to modem.....
>     ATDT <phone_number>
>     quality is good enough
> 
>     Thang Kieu
> 
> 
>     On 8/17/07, Kieu Minh Thang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>         I have checked wvdial and have use minicom before.
>         wvdial seems to used to dialup connect, not to make phone call
>         I have used minicom to handle some circuit (it's likely to 
> HyperTerminal on Windows), I
>         think this can be use to dial because it handle modem with AT 
> commands. If I know AT
>         commands, I can make phone call too.
>         Maybe dtmfdial is a solution too, but I don't know how to configure 
> it yet.
> 
>         any other idea, who have make phone call using modem on Linux before? 
> Please let me know.
> 
>         Thank you all. ;)
> 
>         Thang Kieu
> 
> 
>         On 8/11/07, Ken Irving < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>             On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:20:20PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
>             > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Kieu Minh Thang wrote:
>             >>
>             >> I have install dtmfdial, but it seems my Debian doesn't have 
> driver for
>             >> modem. But I see that dtmfdial is very simple program, just a 
> binary file,
>             >> no config file. How does this know what device used to dial, 
> where can I
>             >> config modem device for it ?
>             >>
>             > you might want to check out wvdial, I've used it before with 
> good results.
> 
>             Minicom is useful to manually control a modem, also cu and 
> probably
>             others, by typing commands to the modem.  The serial interface, or
>             "driver", to the modem is well built into the Linux system
> 
>             An automated "phone dialer" probably exists as a package or 
> project;
>             I'd try googling for those terms, use 'apt-cache search ...', 
> look on
>             sourceforge and other software development sites.
> 
>             I wrote a simple and not very flexible "phone dialer" as an 
> exercise
>             to learn Perl/Tk one time, using the perl Expect module to handle
>             the interactive nature of the problem, and cu as the backend to 
> talk
>             to the modem.  It presents a few buttons in a window to connect 
> to a
>             phone voice message system, listen and delete messages, and 
> disconnect,
>             and optionally puts up a keypad.  I suspect you might be looking 
> for
>             something like this, and you're welcome to it, but there are also 
> likely
>             more fully featured and configurable gizmos out there.
> 
>             You described what you wanted by saying it was "like" some other 
> program;
>             without being familiar with that program, it's hard to know what 
> you want.
> 
>             (Hmm, reminds me of the Microsoft approach to "office" software
>             standards...)
> 
>             Ken
> 
>             --
>             Ken Irving, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Ken Irving, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to