True enough - but in that case there's no use in identifying similarities to begin with.
ap ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] * andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Paul Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:29:17PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote: > > Unfortunately, though, in this case relatedness is not the same thing as > > ancestry - one of the possible histories here is that SCO stole code from > > GPLed code bases, not the reverse. In that case relatedness is high, but > > directionality is the other way. > > I've been operating on the assumption that if there is any code in > common, Linux to SCO is the way it went, not SCO to Linux. SCO has a > lot in common with the punch-happy trailer trash you see on COPS and > that I occasionally have to deal with at work: Can't keep their story > straight, suspecious claims, withholding important details. > > - -- > .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : :' : proud Debian admin and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/H62CJ5vLSqVpK2kRAqOdAJ9jnOs7rYCl0PsFR6F/AvRd3SwXyACggFYn > hQ56QHWw2X0DSjBTdE3VA0Y= > =firD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
