David Brodbeck wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:
> > On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:08:04PM +0100, andy baxter wrote: >>> >>> Incidentally, it would help me at least if the list software could >>> set >>> the 'reply-to' header to the list address. >>> >> Please. Not this argument again. >> >> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful > > I think the arguments there make sense. > > I think people who decry reply-to-munging forfeit their right to > complain when people reply directly instead of to the list, though. ;) Why? Reply-to-mailing-list has been a feature of every mail client worth using this decade. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
