On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:55:19AM -0700, Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: > I understand how aptitude handles automatically installed packages. > Since I have always used aptitude on this box my question, I suppose, is > why is libneon26 still installed. When I uninstalled whatever was > depending on it aptitude should have uninstalled libneon26 at that > time. The only thing that I can see that SHOULD have created this > situation would be if the previous OOo was compiled for libneon26 and > the current OOo is compiled for libneon25. But I can't see why the > maintainers would use an older library in a newer compile of OOo. Does > anyone have any ideas on this?
The version of openoffice.org on ftp.debian.org depends on libneon26, whereas the (newer) version on security.debian.org depends on libneon25. I don't know why this is -- maybe the person who build the etch version had libneon26-dev installed and OOo picked that up automatically? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
