> > Ore writes: > > > I know that it's in the repository but I need the raw binary for 386.
Why? I am afraid only statically linked binary can do that since many distros use different libraries. It will be huge and not flexible, andc even that might not work on some distros with special environments. > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:54:55 -0500 John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don´t understand what you mean by ¨raw binary¨. What´s wrong with the > > binary in the ksh package? On 27.06.07 08:33, Orestes leal wrote: > Well, I don't speak english to good, I meant a Ksh Binary that works in > every linux distro, hope that makes clear the point. please set up your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
