On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 16:03 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:41:28 +0100 > michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 11:52 +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:27:18 -0400 > > > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Nyizsnyik Ferenc wrote: > > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > > > > > I visited http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ > > > > > It used to show 8 bugs "concerning the current stable release", > > > > > that is Etch, and some 500-600 "concerning the next release". > > > > > Now it shows 522 bugs for Etch. Am I missing something? > > > > Yes. The page does not show the word 'etch'. Etch is the current > > > > stable. Lenny is the next stable. If you look at the graph, the > > > > bottom line dips near zero at april or may, that was the release > > > > of Etch. > > > > > > Yes, that bottom line jumped up to 520 recently. Also, 520 bugs are > > > shown for the current stable release. And we agree on that is Etch, > > > > I disagree! From the above it sounds like the graph is for next > > stable, which prior to Apr/May was etch but is now lenny. It's not > > etch only > > Have you folks actually visited the page?
I hadn't (as I thought I made clear!) > There are three lines showing > bug counts: > RED line: Total number of release-critical bugs > GREEN line: Number concerning the next release > BLUE line: Number concerning the current stable release ah, the blue line, that doesn't ring any bell for when I've looked before... > Red and green lines have local minimums at June 2005 (Sarge was > released) and April 2007 (Etch was released). The BLUE line (the one I > was talking about) started in April 2007 with 8 bugs. Yesterday it went > up to 522. And "Number concerning the current stable release: 522". and yes, I concur it says 522 R_C bugs for current stable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
