On 06/12/07 06:20, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I recommend having 2 (or more) drives off-site, each older than the
other.
Isn't that going to be hard to achieve? How can they each be older
than the other? It'd be like you being older than me and me being older
than you, both at once.
The *data*, silly, not the drives.
Take 4 drives, and give each a number (#1..#4).
Week 0, drive #1 gets the current backup.
Week 1, drive #1 is moved off site and #2 gets the current backup.
Week 2, drive #2 is moved off site and #3 gets the current backup.
Week 3, drive #3 is moved off site and #4 gets the current backup.
Week 4, drive #4 is moved off site and #1 returned and gets the
current backup.
Week 5, drive #1 is moved off site and #2 returned and gets the
current backup.
etc
etc
etc.
Did I *really* have to explain something that data centers have been
doing since most of us were in diapers?
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
