On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 17:59 -0800, Ken Irving wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:19:17PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote: > > > > Come, lets here a solution, I've discussed some solutions, how about > > you? > > If folks were reasonable about it, they'd simply "take it off list" > on their own, as is done on many, many other lists. If there's a need > for enforced moderation, would that not be proof that these people have > indeed screwed things up?
THIS, THIS is my choice, and I sorta kinda have been trying to implement it. I may have did it the wrong way by trying to make a joke... but I guess I'll be more blunt from now on. Yes, I expect others to be more blunt to me, should I do the OT-ness everyone is complaining about... And Joe, Roberto, Judd, Michelle, *all*of*us* need to steward ourselves to reduce these things to bearable levels. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05 Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74 E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part