On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 17:59 -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:19:17PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > 
> > Come, lets here a solution, I've discussed some solutions, how about
> > you?
> 
> If folks were reasonable about it, they'd simply "take it off list"
> on their own, as is done on many, many other lists.  If there's a need
> for enforced moderation, would that not be proof that these people have
> indeed screwed things up?

THIS, THIS is my choice, and I sorta kinda have been trying to implement
it. I may have did it the wrong way by trying to make a joke... but I
guess I'll be more blunt from now on.

Yes, I expect others to be more blunt to me, should I do the OT-ness
everyone is complaining about...

And Joe, Roberto, Judd, Michelle, *all*of*us* need to steward ourselves
to reduce these things to bearable levels.
-- 
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key: 1024D/B524687C  2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to