On 2007-05-11, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> I don't understand. Fluxbox comes with a well-written and detailed
>> manpage. Would you rather it didn't, or did you mean to say it's too
>> bad the documentation *isn't* included with fluxbox? Which suggests
>> maybe you didn't realise the man page was there...
>
> I read the fluxbox man page and it wasn't clear what this slit-thing
> was.  Why wasn't the documentation that's available on-line included
> with the package?
>

I didn't realise the online docbook was as good as it is! I see that
someone has already reported the missing docs as a bug
report/wishlist. Unfortunately, that particular bug is over 2 years
old, so the maintainers don't seem too worried about it.

Tyler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to