On 05/11/07 10:33, Amy Templeton wrote: > John Hassler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Amy Templeton wrote: > Well, sweet! So the impression I'm getting is that reverse > engineering is basically protected by law?
I wrote: > When done for interoperability. > So that means that I could use decoder programs without fearing > that they may become illegal? I wrote: > No. Amy Templeton wrote: > Oh well. Well, in that case, I stand by my original position: I do > not want to get used to depending on decoders if I can't have some > degree of assurance they'll be available later. What do you mean by "decoders"? I assumed you meant software for breaking DRM on music and movies. If you mean software for converting documents from proprietary formats the question does not arise: there is no DRM involved. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
