Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-04-05 16:55:57, schrieb zfh:
Its too bad that you never read the documents you
site. Look at the document on treatment of prisoners
of war. The terrorists you seem in sympathy with (see
the first line you wrote in the previous response)
make not atempt to qualify under aritcle 4. Under the
terms of the convention it doesn't apply to them. In
the present circumstances, the US is being extremely
civil with the terrorist, better treatment than
americans and British get around the world even though
our armed forces do quaify under article 4 and our
civilians are clearly civilians. Where do kidnapings,
hostage taking, and beheading figure into the
conventions? International terrorism is not solvable
in the short term, but granting legal protections to
to terrorist that under existing teaty don't deserve
them is the worst possible strategy.
So you think, the kidnaping of 17 german and 8 french cizizen and
threeting as terrorists (7 of them are in Guantanamo) without any
judgement since over 3 years is "extremely civil" ???
The actions of the USA ARE TERRORISM to demoraliser the arabic
comunity and specialy the islamic one.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
i could not agree more than i do with michelle on this point. the
us-government has become a lawless corporate steered oligarchy. ethical
criteria, the basis of all law, have in this police-state been replaced
by the white house with ad-hoc cynism.
steef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
