On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:28:30PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.15.2304 +0200]: > > Unfortunately, what they are doing to keep the possibility of the > > US government trying to take action against them, has caused the > > mainline kernel developers to refuse to include their work in the > > mainline kernel. > > I haven't followed this at all. Is there a comprehensive link?
If you read the mailing list you'll see many flame wars about this. Also, it was mentioned on LKML before the competing IPsec was merged too. > > > I'm going to be using freeswan for a while also, but I'm going to > > be helping to test 2.6-test ipsec to make sure it will be useful > > at 2.6.0. :) > > Of course I will do the same. I am interested in using "native" > stuff whereever possible. However, primarily I need functionality, > and FreeS/WAN has been providing that. I will and am already testing > 2.6 IPsec on test boxes, what I meant is that it will take a while > before I entrust my infrastructure to it. > > PS: Please respect Mail-Followup-To. I don't want CCs on mailing > list posts. #No Duplicates! :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 32768 msgid.cache With this, it never bothers me. But yes I'll press "L" instead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
